Articles

/

Master Control Programs (MCP) Pose Hidden Cybersecurity Risks

Master Control Programs (MCP) Pose Hidden Cybersecurity Risks

Tread carefully.

Blog Image

Anthropic’s Model Context Protocol (MCP) is a new technical framework designed to standardize context sharing between applications and LLMs. At its core, MCP allows developers to seamlessly manage, preserve, and transport user and application-specific context across different AI models and interfaces. It sounds like a developer’s dream: a common standard to simplify integration, ensure continuity, and abstract away complexity.

But beware, if you are an app builder, adopting MCP too early might be borderline suicide for your app.

When you embrace MCP, you risk abstracting away the very details that make your user experience distinct and valuable. You commoditize your core functionality, effectively turning your unique user experience into something replaceable. Your product becomes just another node in an interchangeable web of applications that users can switch between without friction.

Think about what that actually means: by making context portable and standardizing how applications interact with LLMs, MCP unintentionally encourages your users to see your app as fungible. Once users learn they can effortlessly shift their entire interaction context from your app to another MCP-compliant app, you’ve trained them to churn.

Even worse, you’ve positioned yourself between two very challenging forces:

  • Protocol Capture from Above: Aggregators like OpenAI, Anthropic, and Cohere could leverage MCP’s standardization to consolidate their control. You might end up spending most of your energy navigating their changing APIs, politics, pricing, and priorities instead of innovating your own core product.
  • Feature Creep from Below: Because your core UX is standardized, competitors will easily clone your functionality and then incrementally layer new features on top. To survive, you’re forced into a cycle of feature creep, diluting your core experience as you race to differentiate again.

MCP acts as a trapdoor. Once you step through it, you’re no longer competing purely on product innovation or user experience. Instead, you’re competing in a crowded market dictated by protocol politics. Your strategic autonomy shrinks dramatically as you become dependent on whoever controls the aggregation layer.

Early-stage products especially should think twice before adopting MCP. Your primary advantage early on is your ability to build differentiation through unique interactions, tailored context management, and nuanced UX choices. Standardizing these advantages prematurely means you surrender critical leverage.

That’s not to say MCP is without value. It has clear benefits for mature applications or certain platform-level use cases. But adopting it prematurely, before you’ve deeply entrenched your value proposition, is risky. You may end up exchanging your hard-won uniqueness for a seat at someone else’s increasingly crowded table.

Choose carefully: once you step through the MCP trapdoor, it’s difficult to step back out.

Author

Quentin O. Kasseh

Quentin has over 15 years of experience designing cloud-based, AI-powered data platforms. As the founder of other tech startups, he specializes in transforming complex data into scalable solutions.

Read Bio
article-iconarticle-icon

Recommended Articles

Blog Image
Operational Risk: Why Misaligned Business Logic Creates Strategic Debt

The hidden scaffolding that holds data, decisions, and strategy together

Read More
article-iconarticle-icon
Blog Image
Semantic Drift: Why Your Metrics No Longer Mean What You Think

The silent breakdown of metric definitions inside growing organizations.

Read More
article-iconarticle-icon
Blog Image
After the Breach: How Teams Rebuild Data Trust

Why repairing data isn’t enough, and how organizations regain confidence after trust is broken.

Read More
article-iconarticle-icon