How clearly defined context and intelligent conversations shape AI communication.
How clearly defined context and intelligent conversations shape AI communication.
•
May 22, 2025
•
Read time
All good communication has clear rules. We see this in everyday life. Traffic lights follow simple instructions. Green means go, red means stop. Baseball coaches signal clearly to their players. Communication works when both sides agree on what signals mean.
In the world of artificial intelligence, clear communication is equally important. As AI becomes part of more complex tasks, the way these intelligent systems communicate has become increasingly important. Two new terms have recently entered this conversation: Model Context Protocol (MCP) and Agent-to-Agent (A2A) communication. They sound technical, but they are simpler than they seem. Let's examine them clearly, starting from basic principles.
A protocol is simply an agreement. It sets clear rules for exchanging information. A handshake is a protocol. One person extends their hand; the other person takes it. Both sides understand what's expected, and the exchange is smooth.
In computer communication, protocols have a similar purpose. They define how data should be formatted, sent, received, and interpreted. Without protocols, computers would misunderstand each other, just as two people speaking different languages struggle to communicate. Good protocols make sure the message sent is the same as the message received.
Today’s powerful AI models like ChatGPT rely on large amounts of context to understand questions and provide accurate responses. Context includes all the background information given to an AI to help it produce meaningful results. The more clearly the context is structured, the better the AI performs.
Model Context Protocol, or MCP, refers specifically to how we define, format, and communicate this context. MCP sets the boundaries around what the AI is asked to consider. It determines how the model "sees" the question being asked and the information it uses to answer clearly and effectively.
For example, imagine asking an AI model to summarize a complex business document. The MCP specifies exactly which documents or sections of text the model will read and use. It clarifies what background knowledge the model should rely on, how deeply it should analyze the information, and what kind of response is required. MCP is all about clear and careful boundaries.
Without MCP, the model could easily misunderstand the user's intent or draw from irrelevant information. With clearly defined context protocols, the model’s responses become far more precise and useful.
Agent-to-Agent communication is different. While MCP is about carefully managing context within one AI model, A2A is about enabling multiple intelligent AI agents to interact with each other.
An "agent" here means software that can reason independently, adapt to new information, and communicate its ideas effectively. In A2A, these agents exchange information dynamically. They propose ideas, negotiate solutions, and refine their positions based on feedback from other agents.
For example, consider an AI agent managing travel arrangements. This agent communicates directly with another AI agent handling scheduling, and yet another responsible for price negotiation. Each agent shares data, adjusts proposals, and refines decisions collaboratively. This dynamic exchange is flexible, iterative, and adaptive.
A2A communication is thus conversational. It doesn't just pass information clearly from one point to another. It invites interpretation, revision, and joint decision-making.
The distinction between MCP and A2A is clear. MCP carefully defines context for a single AI model. It determines what information is available, how the model processes it, and the structure it uses to respond.
A2A connects multiple intelligent agents. Instead of managing one model’s internal context, A2A manages external conversation between different intelligent systems. It allows for dialogue, negotiation, and collaborative reasoning.
Both approaches matter. MCP ensures accuracy and relevance within a single AI’s reasoning. A2A extends this reasoning across multiple AI systems, enabling them to collaborate on complex tasks.
Effective communication, whether through MCP or A2A, requires clear principles. The same principles that guide good human communication apply to AI communication as well:
By following these principles, we create AI systems that respond clearly, accurately, and reliably. Good AI is always the result of clear and thoughtful design.
Ultimately, good AI communication reflects good human communication. Both rely on clearly defined expectations, shared context, and carefully structured exchanges. When AI performs poorly, it often reveals weaknesses in our own communication methods: unclear prompts, vague context, poor instructions.
As we develop better protocols like MCP and A2A, we are forced to clarify our own thoughts, goals, and intentions. AI, in turn, becomes a mirror to human clarity. The clearer we become, the better our systems behave.
Understanding AI from these first principles helps us build more effective technologies. It encourages simpler, clearer thinking and writing. And it reminds us that the most sophisticated solutions are always built from clear and simple foundations.
How process is quietly killing innovation and driving talent away.
Why human-machine collaboration is the future of enterprise AI.
